38%: Of votes present controlled by a single representative
1: Candidate. Zero alternatives.
879.536 €: 2026 budget now signed by the interim president
What the minutes say — step by step
Timeline according to the official minutes
1. The contextThe long-serving president, D. Cristóbal Sevilla Martí, passes away after more than 30 years in office. The access credentials for the community's bank account were linked to his mobile phone. Without a president, the community cannot operate: no salaries, no suppliers, no social security payments.
2. The convocationThe minutes state the assembly was convened "by the Secretary-Administrator with the approval of the Vice-President". But how that convocation was carried out is not recorded. No certified mail mentioned. No list of owners notified. No proof of delivery. Were all owners formally convened? Some? None? The minutes don't say.
3. The attendanceOn second call (the first failed to reach quorum), 22 people attend. Only 17 have voting rights. The other 5 are in arrears. Total coefficient present: 14.729. Coefficient with voting rights: 7.047.
4. The vote concentrationOf those 17 voters, a single representative — D. José Antonio Matos Pérez — holds the votes of two entities: Chhabria Investments & Girdhari Assoc. (coefficient 1.190) and Alvimat S.L. (coefficient 1.497). Combined: 2.687 — that is 38.1% of all votes present with voting rights.
5. The electionIt is proposed that D. José Antonio Matos Pérez assume the interim presidency. No other candidates come forward. The election is approved unanimously by those present with voting rights.
6. The bank signatoryThe authorised signatures for the community's bank accounts are established: D. José Antonio Matos Pérez and D. José Hernández Pérez (Secretary-Administrator), jointly.
Candidate, voter, and signatory
What the minutes describe is a sequence that, in any other context, would be considered an obvious conflict of interest:
The sequence
1. One person controls 38% of the votes present through proxy representation of two entities.
2. That same person stands as the only candidate for president.
3. That same person votes for himself using the proxy votes he holds.
4. He is elected unanimously — in a room where he controls more than one third of the vote.
5. He obtains bank signatory authority for the community.
6. He signs the convocation for the next assembly, which includes approval of a budget of €879,536.
It is important to note: the minutes do not record anyone objecting to this process. There is no record that Matos Pérez was asked to abstain from voting in his own election. There is no record of a call for other candidates. No debate on the matter is documented.
What the minutes don't explain
The minutes document what happened. But they leave several fundamental questions unanswered:
On representation
Who verified the proxy votes? Who checked that the delegations from Chhabria Investments and Alvimat S.L. were valid? Were formal powers of attorney presented? Did anyone examine them?
On the election
Was a call for candidates made? The minutes state that Matos Pérez "would assume the position". No mention of other candidacies being solicited. Did anyone have the opportunity to stand?
On abstention
Should Matos Pérez have abstained from voting in his own election? If he controls 38% of the vote and votes for himself, the outcome is practically predetermined. Is that compatible with a free election?
On the consequences
Who controls the controller? Matos Pérez now has bank signatory authority, convenes the assemblies, signs the budgets and represents the community. All of this legitimised by 17 voters — of whom he himself controlled more than a third.
6.147 coefficient with no voting rights
There is one additional detail the minutes reveal. Among the five attendees without voting rights due to arrears was an entity with a coefficient of 6.147 — nearly equal to all voters combined (7.047). Had that entity been current on its fees, it would have controlled 46.6% of the votes present.
That entity was the only one to speak during Any Other Business, to express disagreement with a debt the community was claiming through promissory notes.
In other words: the largest owner present couldn't vote because they owed money. And the one who did vote — with accumulated proxies — became president.
What the minutes say — and what those present report
According to the official minutes, the session began at 10:30 on second call and concluded at 11:05 — just 35 minutes. In that time, according to the document, a moment of silence was observed, the financial situation was explained, the president was elected, bank signatory authority was granted, and the session was closed. Three agenda items. A single intervention under Any Other Business. No debate recorded.
The owners who attended describe a very different reality: a long, tense session marked by aggressive confrontations. According to participants, the clashes were so intense that some attendees left the room before the meeting ended. An assembly that, according to those who lived it, lasted far longer than 35 minutes.
If the assembly was truly as brief and peaceful as the minutes suggest, why do those who were there describe it as long and confrontational? And if there was debate, why don't the minutes record it?
That interim president subsequently signed the convocation for the Ordinary General Meeting of 7 March 2026, which includes approval of a budget of €879,536 — 25% more than the previous year.
17 people elected the president. One of them controlled 38% of the votes. That person was elected. He now signs the accounts for the entire community.
On 7 March: demand transparency
The Ordinary General Meeting on 7 March includes under agenda item 6 the election or re-election of the Governing Board. This is your opportunity to demand that the next president is elected under transparent conditions, with multiple candidates and without concentration of proxy votes.
Attend in person. Or delegate your vote. But participate.
Your premises. Your money. Your vote.