Published — and in force from 12 October, at first only in criminal cases

The last step has been taken. The decree appears as Decreto 145/2026, de 15 de septiembre in the Boletín Oficial de Canarias no. 190 of 22 September 2026, as item 3297. Under its disposición final segunda it enters into force twenty days after publication, which means 12 October 2026.

That does not mean every court is covered from that day. The disposición final primera staggers it: from 2026 in criminal matters, from 2027 in the civil courts, from 2028 in the remaining judicial bodies. So from 12 October the right is real only in criminal proceedings; anyone facing a civil court has to wait for 2027.

The promised Registro Administrativo Canario de Personal Facilitador does not exist yet either. Until it is running, the transitional provision applies: the justice department asks the professional bodies and the organisations representing people with disabilities and older people to send in lists of suitable professionals. Those lists may be kept island by island, with preference for whoever is on the list for that island, so that support comes from nearby. Anyone on such a list is later entered in the register automatically. The administration has given itself a year to build the register's software (disposición adicional segunda).

From 65 on request, from 80 on the court's own motion

The practical heart of it lies in a single difference. Between 65 and 79 nothing happens if nobody speaks up: the support exists, but you have to ask for it. From 80 the court may order it without any request, provided the need is apparent. The request is normally made by the person concerned or, the release says, by "una persona de confianza debidamente autorizada" — in practice often a daughter or a son. Beyond that, the court, the prosecution service or any party to the case can set it in motion.

The right is older — and the Canaries are not first

The decree does not invent the entitlement; it organises it. Article 7 bis LEC has required adaptations for older people since 20 March 2024, and expressly defines them as people "con una edad de sesenta y cinco años o más": on request below 80, and from 80 also on the court's own motion. The article was introduced by Ley 8/2021 of 2 June, by which Spain aligned its law with the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities — binding on Spain since 3 May 2008, according to the report of the Consejo General del Poder Judicial of 17 December 2025. The same report records that Decreto 52/2024 of the Comunidad de Madrid regulated the figure "por primera vez, en el ámbito autonómico" — but only for people with disabilities, with no age threshold. Nationally, Real Decreto 707/2026 of 2 September (BOE 218) now names the facilitador procesal as well, from 2 January 2027.

What the facilitator does — and does not do

She draws up an individual profile of the adjustments needed and a report for the court or the prosecutor. She then accompanies the person through the procedural steps, assists when their evidence is taken, prepares them for hearings and makes the essential documents understandable — ideally the same person at every stage. The text draws the limit unusually plainly: she "no hablará en nombre de la persona destinataria ni del sistema de Justicia, ni dirigirá o influirá en sus decisiones". She does not speak for you, and she is not a substitute for a lawyer.

If you do not speak Spanish, this decree is not the answer

This is the commonest misunderstanding. Not one of the sources checked mentions language support for people who do not speak Spanish. The persona facilitadora works in "lenguaje comprensible y fácil" — plain Spanish. She is not an interpreter. Interpretation is a separate matter. In criminal proceedings, Article 123 of the Criminal Procedure Act gives a suspect or defendant who does not speak Spanish the right to an interpreter at every stage where their presence is required, and to written translation of the essential documents — in every case the remand order, the indictment and the judgment. The cost falls on "la Administración, con independencia del resultado del proceso", and under Article 126 that right cannot be waived. In civil proceedings the position is weaker: Article 143 of the Civil Procedure Act merely allows the court to "habilitar como intérprete a cualquier persona conocedora de la lengua", sworn to translate faithfully. The provision requires no professional qualification.