What happened on Lanzarote

Salvador García lets a holiday villa on Lanzarote. A little over a week ago a friend told him his house was being advertised on TikTok; García had never posted anything there. Following the link, he found an account using his own Booking photographs and quoting a lower price than his. The videos did not show the names of the houses, and in some cases the addresses had been altered.

García wrote to the account as an interested customer and asked about his own house. "Le pregunté por dos fechas que estaban ocupadas y me dijo que estaban disponibles" — he named two dates that were already booked and was offered them as free. A rental contract followed that was visibly a template from the internet, together with a request to pay into a bank account before the other side signed. García did not pay and filed a report. Who is behind the account is not established; there is no charge, and the presumption of innocence applies.

Why the report leads nowhere for now

The Guardia Civil told him the report was unlikely to bear fruit: "al no haber sido estafado económicamente, por el momento no hay delito" — as long as nobody has suffered financial loss, there is for the moment no offence. The name and ID number on the draft contract may in addition be invented. That is the uncomfortable side of prevention: whoever grows suspicious in time suffers no loss, and so has no case. Protection lies not at the end, with the police, but at the start, with the booking.

Not an isolated case — but three different cases

On 10 March 2026 the Guardia Civil warned of rising fraud in holiday rentals advertised on social media and named TikTok: stolen photographs, luxury properties at conspicuously low prices, pressure from supposed rival bookers, payment by bank transfer or Bizum. La Voz de Fuerteventura and Diario de Avisos reported it.

Two further Lanzarote cases have to be kept apart from that. On 17 July 2026 the Guardia Civil said its Equipo Arroba had broken up a network that took some 20,000 euros from a holiday-rental company; five people are under investigation. There the victim was the company, not the traveller: a supposed intermediary brought in bookings using false customer details and stolen card data (Crónicas de Lanzarote). And on 14 January 2023 the same paper reported a case of "web spoofing" in which a victim was lured to a cloned copy of a rental platform and transferred 843 euros.

The registration number, and how to check it

In the Canaries every listing must carry a registration number. Under article 8.6 of Canary law 6/2025 the entry "contendrá necesariamente un número de registro", to be shown in any advertisement, including on digital platforms. The national NRUA number no longer serves as proof: in 2026 the Supreme Court struck down articles 5, 8, 9 and 10 of Real Decreto 1312/2024.

Checking takes no official visit. The Canary government publishes the registered holiday lets as an open dataset: on 16 September 2026 it held 72,389 entries, 10,911 of them on Lanzarote, each with number, municipality, address and bed count; on Lanzarote every number begins "VV-35-". Anyone given a number can look up whether it exists and whether the municipality and address fit the offer. A listing with no number is no proof of fraud, but it does not meet the rules — reason enough not to pay.

What an owner can do — and what not

TikTok lists impersonation in its guidelines as a violation and takes reports from the profile itself: open the profile, more options, report, report account, choose a reason. For stolen photographs there is additionally the copyright route. Both are platform decisions rather than legal remedies, and they can take time while another account is already online.

Officially, little remains, and that is part of the story. Anyone who has lost money can file electronically: fraud by digital means is one of the few matters accepted online, around the clock and without later confirmation at a barracks. Anyone who, like García, has suffered no loss can pass information through the Guardia Civil contact form on telematic crime, which the force itself says has purely informational effect. This text is information, not legal advice.